Project Grants

For applicants proposing clinical or non-clinical research projects that aim to address sight loss caused by any eye condition.

NOTE: Our Lived Experience reviewers are integrated into the 2nd stage of assessment in the Project Grants call. 

  • Maximum funding: up to £250,000
  • Duration: 3 years
  • Stage 1 deadline: TBC

Timeline

Dates and times for the next opening of our Project Grant Awards are to be confirmed. 

Success rates - 2023/24

  • 58%
    Stage 1 abstract applications
  • 43%
    Stage 2 full applications

Eligibility

  • Lead applicants and co-applicants must be affiliated with UK academic or medical institutions.
  • The research must take place within the UK, although with justification, a small amount of the work can be conducted overseas where this is essential to the success of the project. Plans and costs should be clearly stated and justified in the application form.
  • Lead applicants are expected to have a PhD or MD and will usually have a tenured post or be able to demonstrate that they will have a salary for the lifetime of the grant.
  • Lead applicants must not currently have two or more active grants with the charity. An applicant with two active grants where one (or more) is due to end by the outcome date of this scheme may still apply.

Financial support

Funding is made in line with AMRC’s position statement on supporting research in universities.

Applications can include costs for:
  • Salaries for the person(s) carrying out the research e.g. a named research co-applicant, a recruited post-doctoral researcher, statistician, or research nurse
  • Consumables
  • Equipment essential for the project
  • Animal costs
  • Open access publication costs
  • Conference costs
  • Other expenses, such as PPIE or travel
Applications cannot include costs for:
  • Salaries for the lead applicant or co-applicant(s)
  • A PhD student to carry out the work
  • Maintenance of equipment
  • Recruitment costs
  • Indirect costs
  • Non-attributable overhead costs

 

Applications can be made for projects of a shorter duration up to the maximum funding value. However, applicants must be able to demonstrate feasibility, scientific excellence, and value for money.

Application process

We have recently moved our Grants Management System from CC Grant Tracker to Benefactor Cloud.

Please see our guidance page for information on how to create an account. 

Go to Benefactor Cloud.

Application process

Project Grant Awards involve a two-step process.

All applications must be submitted via Fight for Sight’s Benefactor Cloud system. New applicants must register for an account to access the application form.

When creating an account, the lead applicant at the host organisation will be the “main contact” on the grant system and will initiate the application. Once started, they can add any co-applicants to the application as additional contact(s).

If invited to Stage 2, your full application will require approval from one authorised signatory of the host institution (Finance Officer) following application submission on Benefactor Cloud. We allow 72 hours (three days) from the deadline for approvals. It is recommended to seek the appropriate signatory as early as possible, as they must be added when you submit your application. Please consider any annual leave and double check email addresses, as applications with outstanding approvals 72 hours past the deadline will not be processed.

Go to Benefactor Cloud

 

Review process

Fight for Sight is a member of the Association of Medical Research Charities (AMRC) and follows their guidelines for best practice in peer review.

Project Grants involve a two-step process, with an abstract and full application stage.

Abstract applications will be scored by three members of the Research Grant Assessment Panel (RGAP).

To ensure that we fund the highest quality research, successful awards must pass a minimum quality threshold as determined by Fight for Sight's RGAP.

Invitations for full application submissions will be shared with applicants following the triage panel. All applicants will receive feedback at this stage.

Full applications will be shared with three external peer reviewers who are experts in the field. The reviews will be shared with the applicants for rebuttal.

Your full application will also be reviewed by a person with lived experience of vision loss, which will feed into the review process. 

Full applications, reviews and rebuttals will be discussed at a RGAP meeting. The RGAP will make recommendations to Fight for Sight's Grants and Impact (G&I) Committee on which applications are fundable. The G&I Committee will then make recommendations to the Board of Trustees considering the RGAP feedback and the strategic interests of the charity when making the final funding decision. 

Outcomes and further feedback will be shared with all applicants who submitted a full application.

The following review criteria across three key themes are used when considering the application:

  • Key theme 1: Scientific merit
    Category 1: Project
    • An important, clear and focused research question, which is hypothesis driven and/or a PICO question
    • Achievable in the timeframe
    • Adequate and appropriate methods for the research question
    • Evidence to support the feasibility of the project
    • Adequate and appropriate plans for the evaluation of research outcomes, including a sample size / power calculation
    Category 2: Research team and environment
    • A research team with suitable experience and expertise evidenced by a good track record that will contribute to the project's success
    • A research environment with the appropriate facilities and resources
    Category 3: Governance
    • Appropriate consideration for risks, budget and ethics

     

  • Key theme 2: Importance of research
    Category 1: Addressing unmet need driven by public involvement
    • Identification of an important, clear unmet need
    • Public involvement in the development of the research proposal, involvement plans throughout the project and engagement plans upon completion
    • Realistic outline of pathway to potential benefit for people with or at risk of sight loss
    Category 2: Potential for progress
    • Avoiding duplication of existing or ongoing work
    • Clear pathway to impact
    • Likelihood of significant new understanding or evidence
  • Key theme 3: Capacity building
    Category 1: Training and opportunities
    • Focus on training and development
    • Support from research team and environment
    Category 2: Future in vision research
    • Demonstrated interest in remaining, becoming, or training a vision researcher
    • Clear next steps for future studies and funding

Any questions? 

You can contact our scientific research team with your questions or for support by email. 

Get in touch
Group of researchers working together in the lab
  • Timeline
  • Success rates
  • Eligibility
  • Financial support
  • Process